Possibly people are posting links that are not reachable from the website root, and Google indexes them. Seems to me that anything Google sees had to be reachable by ordinary means since Google and everyone else just crawls the website for the top. If anyone doesnt understand make a reply, and or google the term, or look at the link Nothing but downvotes on the first reference, and no response or votes on the explanation? Not exactly consistent, but ok. omit the asterisks **"parent directory" intitle:"index of"**
#Sharebeast search file full#
ill give you one example as a full search term to pull an index. its using google operators to pull up pages that are not linkable directly in many cases. I'm going to assume "dork" is autocorrect for "search". Google dork your stuff if you have to get *an extra copy of your already owned files* In the modern era, Bela Fleck is a prime example, though Springsteen recorded Nebraska at his house back in the 90s. I can count a number of artists that the majority of people will have no idea who they are, but at the end of the day they are big enough to make a living doing what they love doing concerts and merch even if they give away their CDs You can go broke touring like petty, or you can go broke by having bad business deals with your label like TLC.īut if you invest in yourself, you tour yourself, you print your own merch yourself you can go far. Oh there are many ways of doing it right and wrong in the industry. It all depends on your leverage with the recording company.īTW, you can go bust touring. Of course the law could be better, but considering performers who got zero because they weren't listed as writers, they are infinitely better off.Īnd don't pretend the authors don't get paid. Yeah, thank the president that played the saxophone. Getting paid on music is dead, its about touring and merchĪctually depending on when the music was recorded and on the means of distribution, even musicians let alone the writers get paid. I think his point is he has given bands a shot listening to them whom he never would have heard before, as he never would have spent money on their stuff to hear it.īy downloading it for free, and realizing he liked the band, he now has a reason to spend money on them, either at live concerts, CDs or other merch.
Any approach predicated on 100% conversion, or even as much as 25% conversion, is guaranteed to fail. But neither would all pirates pay for what they pirate if pirating was not an option for them. I got friends that are just cheap and don't want to buy a song for $1.29 or attend a concert. Isn't that part about buying CDs a contradiction? Not that I disagree about Cary Sherman being a douche bag or that some pirates attend concerts, but don't pretend they all contribute for what they don't spend. "Millions of users accessed songs from Sharebeast each month without one penny of compensation going to countless artists, songwriters, labels, and others who created the music.Įxcept for the millions the filesharers spent when they discovered new music and bought their CDs, DVD`s of live concerts, and paraphernalia at said concerts. Chairman and CEO Cary Sherman said in a statement.
0 kommentar(er)
